More stuff that I don’t understand.
A Mr. Mike Morgan, who runs this website, is, according to Anna Raccoon, being threatened by lawyers employed by the wunch of bankers the details of whose behaviour (doubtless very naughty, but well over my head) he has had the temerity to criticise.
It looks as though they’re going for ‘intellectual property’ rather than ‘libel’. Interesting in itself.
AR suggests that Mr. Morgan should be supported by linking to him, hence this digression from today’s overtly policey theme. Once again, that’s Goldman Sachs 666. Anyone who is prepared to believe that not all financial people are making it up as they go along might consider reading it.
Mr. Morgan: I may not understand what you are saying, but I will defend your freedom to say it.
Don’t know what this is all about, but as a libertarian I am far more likely to suspect that the “economic crisis” has been caused by governments and people like Gordon Brown and his chums, than by “bankers”. Bankers have merely been the coerced tools in the drama. Look at what the nasty Clintonians did to US banks who were initially reluctant to lend money to what said Clintonians said were “natural democrat voters”.
I haven’t a clue what it’s about, and I would be inclined to agree with your analysis. It was only a bit of blogger solidarity really.