The BBC (caveat more or less everyone), found by Boing Boing, alleges that the Dutch government is trying to prevent a (literally) born sailor from sailing.
Once upon a time Miss Dekker’s ambition would have been celebrated (despite having been to the Netherlands I can’t remember whether or not they ever had an equivalent of Blue Peter) as evidence of the ‘diversity’ of the numerous accomplishments demonstrated by the Dutch.
Unfortunately nowadays ‘diversity’ no longer has this meaning; it now appears to mean ‘everyone, regardless of their race, colour, creed, gender alignment, etc. etc. ad naus being hammered down flush into identical, politically-determined cultural forms from which individual ambition and achievement are rigorously excluded’.
I suppose that though we British, groaning under the same yoke, might sympathise with Miss Dekker personally, we might comfort ourselves with the thought that at least now she won’t be sailing up the Medway and burning the Royal Navy in its own dockyard, like one of her predecessors.
[...] she won’t be afloat up the Medway and executing the Royal Navy in … Original post: Narrow carelessness for Royal Navy « The Landed Underclass Posted in Uncategorized | Tags: and-burning, british, dekker, groaning-under, medway, [...]
This “socialworking” is too bad as it clouds the individual issue of whether this particular 13-year-old is ready or not to go. Government categorical intervention of this sort seems so often to bring “caring” neurotics with “credentials” into the fray! This miserable extraversion turns everything into a freedom-struggle between The Chimps, when we all need instead /inwardly/ to learn how to sit back, assess the whims and desires so often blown into our heads like Pooh Bear’s fluff — and learn to sort out impulses from actual /value/!
Now THAT sort of mental and moral competence (!) would be Freedom.
The best comment — based on REMEMBERED actual experience of being thirteen and adventurous — comes in /Boing-Boing/, at:
http://www.boingboing.net/2009/08/25/dutch-government-tri.html
#83 posted by Secret_Life_of_Plants, August 25, 2009 3:54 PM
“As a girl I spent many (disobedient) years before the age of 13 riding my horse in the Arizona desert, away from any adult supervision, away from almost everyone (rarely seeing another human being or building). When I did see someone way out in the desert, it usually involved being shot at by teenage boys who were goofing around, being trampled by my spooked horse, being chased by guys on dirtbikes, tracked by packs of feral dogs, chased by drunk men in cars, etc. I already killed 2 rattlesnakes. I knew all the survival skills to get food and water in the desert if something happened. If something broke I knew how to set it. If I needed a tool I could figure out how to make it. Looking back, with 20/20 hindsight, I can honestly say that, had I known how to sail, I could have circumnavigated the globe.
“The average age of Napoleon’s “Savants” in Egypt was 17. That was the “average” age. They’d already lived through the French Revolution and graduated from French polytechnical institutes many of them went on to found or head the major scientific foundations of France.
“I just think that we really underestimate kids.”
This submission echoes the reported experience of krakkisdottir, an often-commentor in /Bodwyn Wook/ who at thirteen, or younger perhaps, got thrown Miles From Nowhere in the NoDak Badlands, busted an arm and was then rescued by (horrors!) some young Mexican men (who actually did NOT harm her!)
“I just think that we really underestimate kids.”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Farragut:
“David Farragut entered the Navy as a midshipman on December 17, 1810. In the War of 1812, when only 12 years old, he was given command of a prize ship taken by USS Essex and brought her safely to port.”
Think about that for a moment: at an age where most British kids are barely considered able to leave the house unchaperoned, this boy was commanding a ship under the auspices of the US Navy.
Keeping people childish throughout their lives is one of the left’s goals, because childish adults look for someone to tell them what to do and are therefore very easy to control.
Couldn’t agree more.
[...] http://landedunderclass.wordpress.com/2009/08/26/narrow-escape-for-royal-navy/ [...]